Digital transformation and Business bones

I love that people are focusing attention on “digital transformation.” Every consulting firm has a practice area, every research firm and think tank has a report and every business magazine has a series of stories.  Google shows 7.3 million search results.

My entire career has been about transformation. In the early years it took the form of new product development and generating demand with advertising. The transformation was largely formed with persuasion and clever ideas, communicated to people with TV and print, and by making the item available at the local market.

By the 1990’s the transformation started becoming digital with infrastructure things like websites, email, and ecommerce — requirements easily added to any legacy business. This was largely a tactical exercise with marginal impact to the core of a business. Of course many new businesses were created, born of the digital ecosystem and a growing generation of natives.

Having celebrated the 25th anniversary of the World Wide Web, we now see a type and magnitude of new company not previously possible. Facebook, Alibaba, Uber and Airbnb are examples for this new type of company whose existence is grounded in digital technologies and which are highly differentiated from their competition.
goodwin 4 companies

Interesting, but what about legacy companies —  companies that make and sell things the good old fashion way?  Theodore Levitt’s famous marketing myopia mantra – What business are you in? – has little value in the face of this type of competition.

What is needed is a way to think about an existing business in a different way. Just like a building is subject to architecture for the planning, designing, and constructing, so too is a business, especially a business that seeks to transform itself.

Business Architecture is a formal practice – a conceptual framework – to blueprint the relevant business structures that can guide digital transformation.

BA diagram

With this single blueprint of the business structure, all stakeholders can share an understanding of interconnectedness and how changes in one area will impact other areas. What’s more, this blueprint will provide common vocabulary and a framework with which to discuss transformation. Everyone gets on the same page and shares the same knowledge.

In a building renovation, professionals often refer to the “bones” of a building, the equivalent to our bones and skeleton, being good or bad. Business bones are also a good metaphor for what is good or bad as a subject of transformation.

In a taxi company example (aka, Uber), one bone is a hard assets/cars and another is labor/driver. The taxi company, wanting to remove these bones would need to understand the changes for hiring/re-staffing and vehicle provisioning.

In a general merchandise store example (aka, Alibaba), the marketing and delivery bones would need to be added and the store either discarded or transformed into a warehouse. Staff would be retrained to new positions and hours of operation.

In the context of digital transformation, the critical component involves Information Technology Transformation (ITT). Business Architecture is particularly well suited to mapping and aligning transformations from Business to IT and the current “as-is” to the future “to-be” requirements.

Screenshot 2016-08-24 14.46.18

With a clear understanding of the business structure and bones, plus how to align Business and IT transformation, innovation has a solid bedrock from which to build.

Contact me to continue the conversation.

Read about That Doggone Digital Transformation article for more insights.
Larry W. Smith

Twitter: @lwsmith10011

linkedin.com/in/lwsmith10011

larrysmith.contently.com

Doggone Digital Transformation

dogDigital transformation is a hot topic in Corporate America for good reason: legacy companies, selling “real” products with established value and customers nurtured over many years, are getting crushed by new companies who seemingly have no value other than some digital-internet-mobile-social voodoo.

You’ve heard about Uber and Airbnb, but recently the Dollar Shave Club ($SC) — selling razors in a field dominated by two Fortune 50 companies — was purchased by Unilever for $1 billion.

$SC was notable for having a great sales video and direct-to-consumer relationships but it neither made its products or mass promoted nor distributed them; a perfect disruption in the mass distribution channels.

The lesson is not in the disruption, but rather how it is possible to reinvent, innovate, and leverage up existing assets.

My friend Rob called bullshit on me regarding “how easy” is was to digitally transform a legacy company into a modern day Uber or Airbnb of a given category.

Since both Rob and I use Business Architecture as a way to describe value creation in any given company, it was fairly easy to explain how one might transform a traditional company with some applied digital tools and techniques.

Source: http://www.businessarchitectureguild.org

Rob knows I dislike dogs (cat guy), so he said I was CEO and asked how I would digitally transform a dog food manufacturer. Let’s assume this is a $1B revenue business, operating for 50+ years, has a strong regional brand with loyal customers, strong distribution to specialty pet stores, food, drug, and mass merchants, and sells 10 SKUs of wet and dry dog food.

A business architectural analysis of the potential for Digital Transformation highlights 4 value streams that support the opportunity:

  • Product Manufacturing, with both the recipes and the branding. Labels alternative branding are inexpensive,
  • R&D knowledge about dogs, their diet, nutrition, and overall health
  • Strong just in time operations and logistic to service over 2,000 accounts
  • Basic ERP systems, accounting and general technology systems integrated across most of the Operations, though lacking for sales, marketing, and customer relationships.

To undertake a digital transformation, key missing components would have to be addressed:

  • A value stream that dealt with the customer or “end-user” as a stakeholder. Having relied upon a traditional distribution and direct retail relationship, there was no knowledge about or engagement with the actual customer: the person, family, or dog.
  • Further, there are no capabilities or information in support of consumption or purchase behavior. There was nothing about the dog’s health, activity, age, location or its’ well being. For example: was the dog on a farm or ranch or in a city apartment?

Starting with low-hanging fruit — things other companies are doing and 3rd party suppliers offer — we came up with these ideas that address both the relationships with consumers and the underlying economic model. These ideas are easily applied using existing assets and value streams and minimal investments for pilots and test markets.

  • License an activity tracker digital device (e.g., Fitbit, Garmin) or for dogs. This will include a smartphone and computer app tailored and branded to the company specifications. Critical to this is an understanding of diet, activity, and nutrition. For example, the dog may be more active in the summer and need more protein, but less active in the winter and need fewer calories with more vitamins and other nutrients.
  • Create a CRM infrastructure and outreach program to individuals; this includes customer accounts and billing, customer service, and related logistics capabilities. The CRM should also be tied to advertising and other outreach programs.
  • Develop and promote a custom direct-to-consumer distribution program that automatically sends “customized” food. A TBD big issue is the ability to change formula and recipe to meet certain requirements for calories and quantity. Ideally, Fido would have his own label with portion control.

Disruption to existing channels of distribution can be offset with data and knowledge about customers and purchase behavior, plus separation with new branding and direct to consumer (and dog) relationships.

This is certainly an oversimplification and abbreviated description of both Business Architecture and Digital Transformation. It does however exemplify the clarity of thinking and ability to focus strategy into a few meaningful and actionable activities.

We can do this for your business. Contact me.

Stoopid AI

stupid AIrt2_Fotor

Most people think Artificial Intelligence (AI) looks like a robot, is smarter than a human, and only speaks the truth.

The entertainment industry would have us believe that AI systems are attractive Caucasian robots with minds of their own like Ava in Ex Machina and Sonny in I, Robot. And that they come in angry versions like the Terminator soldiers and shiny happy servants like C3PO in Star Wars.

ex-machina-2015-11With this connection to humanity, it’s funny that nobody talks about stupid AI.

Be certain, we’re going to have a world of stupid AI, some might be robotic, but regardless of form, their knowledge base will be tilted, biased or just plain wacked. Just like people.

Here’s how it goes down.

In the beginning there will be an AI platform, IBM Watson is a good example of a robust AI you can buy today. Off the shelf Watson knows nothing, not even math, and does nothing except learn. You need to teach it. You teach it by feeding it information.

What information? This is where stupid comes in.

Information, knowledge, and wisdom is very confusing when you try to add any amount of accuracy and reliability; it is downright head breaking when you try to subject it to truth. These are age-old philosophical issues dating to Aristotle, Plato, and Confucius and we still haven’t figured it out.

Many people believe a popular opinion is true, or if it comes from a certain source, it must be accurate. With some social issues, like Celebrity gossip, popularity does rule and proofs are difficult to come by. It gets harder when you contrast, for example, creationism vs. evolution in a literal interpretation vs. science discovery argument.

Let’s feed the AI with the body of knowledge (a corpus of information) built from the billions of words written in favor of creationism. Let’s also add billions of words that align with it and do not contradict it such as Evangelical teachings.

Then start asking this Cognitive Creationist AI some questions.

In the example case of using IBM Watson as the platform, you will get a “probabilistic” answer with 90% confidence that the world was created between 5,700 and 10,000 years ago. Part of the rationale supporting this is that according to Gallup survey’s, 47% of USA adults answered that “God created humans in their present form at one time within the last 10,000 years.”

Not to pick on religion as an easy target, but similar issues are pervasive in “sciences” particularly medicine and nutrition. The science around sugar and high fructose corn syrup has raged on for decades with study contradicting study. Same for medical issues around cholesterol and high blood pressure, their causes and treatment, using diet vs. pharmaceuticals are still subject to divergent facts.

Also in terms of medicine, countries around the world differ on what best practice treatment might be recommended, such as herbal over drugs, or acupuncture over surgery, so a medical AI in China could yield different answers that may or not be stupid.

While not technically stupid, note an AI could be trained with structured information to return biased answers; for example as a new form of paid endorsement and Branding awareness. The answer to “the best, most popular, favorite, cool, great” thing can be taught and also associated with certain other answers and attributes.

  • AI, where is a popular beach destination in January?
  • Answer: The Cancun-brand resort is popular and has a special offer that includes Airline-brand discounts and Branded meal vouchers.
  •  AI, I need more calcium in my diet.
  • Answer: milk is popular but Brand name cheese is more tasty.

With apologies to Forrest Gump, “stupid is what stupid teaches.” Let’s hope we humans are able to ultimately find Intelligence of the non-artificial kind first.

Or maybe my AI will negotiate with your AI for a true fact.

Ask me anything. Click to read more about AI and branding.

Larry Smith

The Interactive Media & Advertising Crash

toy cars crashAdvertising is my friend. I started my career as a MadMan working for Della Femina Travisano and Partners at 625 Madison Avenue, and went on to found US Interactive a digital media and e-commerce development agency.

Only now has it dawned on me that the problem with media & advertising is you don’t know what you’re buying, and you’re never sure you got it.

The Internet was supposed to change that, but instead, it made it worse.

From the earliest days of magazines and newspapers, you knew the ad size and circulation, and even some distribution and location information, but you never knew who, where and when your ad was being consumed and if it did anything.

Radio and Television changed some of that by improving upon where (home) and when (schedule), but gave up who and circulation (called reach), which created the problem of unknown frequency (how often a person viewed the ad).

Digital media and the Internet was supposed to change all that, and it did, but not for the better. We were supposed to know the exact time and place, we would know how to attribute and track actions, and we could predict preferences by observing actions. Accountability and targeting were the promise.

Unfortunately the promise has failed, and the solutions are elusive, though we can boil it down to 3 issues and offer 3 solutions.

The first issue is all about fraud. Server farms and botnets all around the world click on ads into and out of fabricated content sites and pages. Estimates suggest 92% of ads served are not seen, thereby defrauding advertisers of $7.5 billion!

The second issue of buying involves “programmatic” which allows automated systems to bid/ask, then automatically purchase and serve an ad that fits within programmed parameters. While this simplifies buying, it exemplifies the fact you do not know what you are buying, and obfuscates what you actually got; in Knowledge Management and Marketing Theory, this would be characterized as buying an abstraction rather than a specific thing.

The third issue is target market “inference” or the belief you can profile a browser and cookie into a prospect customer because of behavior, context, or availability. We all know how this works: you constantly see ads for products you’ve already bought. I liken it to driving forward by looking through the rearview mirror to chase after a customer that waved at you as you’ve long since passed.

So much for the tragedy, what are the solutions to knowing what you bought and knowing what you got?

The first and easiest solution is to put the people back into the equation. The human factor is more expensive, you pay a premium, and for the most part, can only buy from “premium publishers” who still have a sales staff to package a plan and take your money. Smaller niche publishers can be contacted directly and you should buy a longer-term sponsorship. It might look like you are spending more money for less, but in an industry where 92% of ads might not be seen, the premium of buying real ads to reach real people delivered by real publishers is economically smarter.

The second solution is to become a publisher yourself, using the same tools for creating fresh, original content (articles and video), building audience (e-mail programs), and curating content (save and republish). This is a long-term strategy, it is durable and sustainable, and it enables both brand building and immediate e-commerce opportunities especially when linked to a mobile strategy and apps.

For large advertisers that need scale and efficiencies from automation, the third solution is to abandon most of the ad-tech, which accounts for about one-third of the costs, and channel those funds back into buying “tonnage.” Acknowledge the fraud and waste, but make it up in volume and run big data analytics instead.

Of course mileage may vary for you and your business, but the reality is the Internet environment and technology is not making the digital media and advertising world better.

Accountability is elusive and requires personal hands-on management to succeed. CMD-Y: History.

Ask me anything. Check out some other articles here.

Larry Smith

My how Manhattan has changed.

Maps of ManhattanI just discovered some absolutely amazing maps of Manhattan created from a mash-up of 4 David Rumsey maps from the 1800’s on top of the current Google Street map.

I discovered a few very interesting things. Note the build out of the island at:

  • World Financial Center @ Rector St,
  • Chelsea from West 20-36 St, and
  • UWS around 70th St.

But the most awesome change is at the top of the island where Spuyten Duyvel Creek has changed shapes when they filled the creek and made Marble Hill part of the Bronx and CONUS; toggle the 1836 map and 2012 maps to see the dramatic change. Also, to that Marble Hill remains part of Manhattan even though it is now in the Bronx.

Also, the other 2 islands that are part of Manhattan also had big changes: Governors Island more than doubled in size, and Randalls Island was combined with Wards Island and Sunken Meadow Island to also double in size. This was a great idea since both are largely recreational.

Play for your self here: http://maps.google.com/gallery/details?id=zDoXIAU5tGiw.k8dc28wqOJhM&hl=en

Start-ups and the 5 P’s

5psIf you traveled off planet in 1999 and just returned, you might think nothing changed in the world of Internet start-ups.

There’s tons of money chasing a few big ideas, incubators galore, and a whole service economy of lawyers, accountants, consultants, advertising agencies and monetization programs.

Every Tom, Dick, and Aunt Mary wants to do a start-up instead of buying a lottery ticket.

What has changed is the speed and quality of these new ventures. The LAMP ecosystem (Linux, Apache, MySQL, and Perl/Python programming languages) instant on, auto-scaling cloud-based resources, plus myriad APIs have given new meaning to “demo or die” and credence to a strategy of “fast fail.”

As a seasoned entrepreneur, service provider, Banker, Venture Capitalist, and consultant over the past 20 years, I’ve had a number of views into the business of creating value from the Internet and related technology platforms.

I believe these 5 P’s describe the roadmap.

Prototyping is by far and away the most fun and interesting because it includes two other P’s: Possibilities & Potential. There are fewer great words of motivation and inspiration than: “that’s interesting, we can do it.”

Hand in glove with Prototyping is Presentation. An idea not shared is like kissing in the dark, where you and your partner know it but nobody else does. Presentations may be informal to friends and family, and formal in a fund raising pitch, but regardless, you need to make the idea real and alive. More than one business has succeeded from the promise in a prototype.

Promotion is the next phase and it’s characterized by other concepts like defining customer benefits, social sharing, scaling and distribution, pricing and momentum. A recent study published by Adeven reported that 400,000 iTune apps (about 65%) were “zombies” and never downloaded.

Promotion quality and strength is what sets the vast majority of start-ups apart as successes vs. failures.

The next P is a sad one, but all too common for the vast majority of ventures, and it’s about Pleading, which is sometime connected to or confused with Praying. Most of the glow from possibilities & potential has been crushed into practical Ps of daily matters: payroll, personnel, and predators.

In many cases the founders and start-up team are stretched to the limit as new capital is slow to come in and the promotion fuel tanks run low. It’s also when predators appear on the landscape to poach your idea, your staff, and your customers so new distractions and scarce resources are allocated to defending your space instead of growing it.

Hopefully your investors are understanding at this point and have given you enough runway to get to the next stage: Performance.

Performance is that well oiled machine that makes you money while you sleep, where you have fans doing the promotion for you, and where you can get back to possibilities & potential for the new innovation of your product/service to grow faster and bigger.

There are even more P’s to explore, but no matter what, don’t fall prey to the worse P: Procrastination. Get some swoosh on and just do it.

Big Picture Branding

quote 1This is the golden age of photography. And it’s more important than ever for digital  marketers.

Virtually everyone with a mobile phone has a digital camera to make pictures. Facebook says more than 350 million pictures are posted daily; that’s more than the total USA population. Add in all the other social sites like Instagram, Pinterest, Flickr, Picasa, Google+, and iCloud and there must be billions of images a day being shared, and this doesn’t include all the photo’s we keep private, archive or delete.

If you are a brand manager, ad agency, musician, artist, or any type of creator, your marketing mission is to make your brand photogenic.

What is a photogenic brand, and what’s the strategy? Simply put, to be photogenic you need to create an attractiveness, some charisma, energy and intensity in every captured image. If it looks normal, shake it up. Put your brand in context, unique situations or surroundings, use various effects and lighting to create drama, explore micro, macro, and panoramic images. In other words, be creative and innovative. As Matt Hardy said, “Beauty can be seen in all things, seeing and composing the beauty is what separates the snapshot from the photograph.”

The strategy is to increase the chances of people engaging with the image and sharing it. Since cost is minimal or free, one should favor volume and creativity over expensive and few “special” images.

 In it’s ultimate extreme, a photogenic brand would have a picture at every touchpoint and with every customer.

Two side notes worth exploring: branding and tagging.

There are insane amounts of writing to guide your thoughts on branding, but for the purposes of a photogenic brand it would be wise to consider brand development in the widest possible light. For example contrast automobile pictures which are always 80% car and 20% setting or driver verses beer or beverages that are 80% people having fun and 20% product and logo. Many more connections and attractiveness could be had by mixing up the ratio’s and breaking some rules.

In the digital age of discovery, it is imperative that a photograph be properly and deeply tagged so it turns up in searches. The tags should include characteristics like brand name or hashtag, location, day/date, and names of people and things shown, but you should go far deeper into emotional words, mood or state of mind, concepts like peace and justice. Again, the strategy is to connect your brand to as many concepts as possible.

Start making your photogenic brand today by taking a picture of yourself with the brand, tag it, post it.